The following it totally based on you posting in the divorce forum, therefore allowing me to assume that’s the path you have decided on, plus your officer-background:
Back in the days I attended a course about decision making in crisis/pressure situations. The lecturer had a military background, and he shared what they are looking for in officer-training. Basically, by the time you are even considered for officer training they have already decided you have the ability to think. With that ability, what they are looking for is the ability to find intel/info, evaluate intel/info, decide on a plan and then implement that plan. Once the implementation has started, they look for the ability to evaluate the reaction, the ability to evaluate new data/intel and the decision process of possibly altering the plan accordingly.
Example: When going through a forest you come to a clearing. You recall your intel briefing from that morning that the odds of enemies being in the area are low, yet you gather more info by having your team scour the other side of the clearing, trying to see if someone is there in hiding. After evaluating the situation, you might tell your team to cross. To minimize risk, you send a smaller team well-spread first, and then the rest in a well distributed pattern to minimize the risk of everyone getting caught in an ambush. This is you evaluating date and implementing a plan that you then carry on through despite not knowing if your data is correct or not.
Your team makes it safely across does not mean the 10 minutes spend evaluating and crossing in a slower manner is wasted. It simply means you evaluated, decided and implemented and got your task done.
Your team gets caught in an ambush does not mean you made a mistake. Well... not unless you clearly saw the enemy aiming their guns at your before you entered the clearing. It then becomes important how you planned and how you react. For the people training officers, what they want least of all to see is either adhering to a plan that clearly won’t work OR inaction. Those that ignore the risk (cant read and evaluate info/intel). Those that don’t even try to get across the clearing (inaction). Those that send their men across despite clear signs of the enemy (stupidity). Those that don’t respond once the sh hits the fan (inaction, stupidity, fear...).
I mention this because I think we betrayed spouses sometimes fall into that group that the people managing officer training might consider ditching from the course... We fall into inaction and fear, often caused by lack of info OR wrong info... I think the KEY to our recovery tends to be creating a plan based on the best REAL info we can get, implementing it and then possibly altering it according to how the universe reacts...
You mention some fears...
Your very title says contested divorce...
Seeing as you haven’t filed, she hasn’t been served and you therefore don’t have her reaction then that is at best a guess on her possible reactions. For all you know she might dance a jig all the way to court, glad to be out.
Even if she protests – contests the divorce. Gone are the days when you had to have a reason to file. In most/many instances her ability to "contest" will be limited to delaying the process. Even then – the whole divorce process is like a snowball that slowly gathers momentum. She can delay signing some document or offering some information, but even if she refuses there is a process that eventually has the judicial system saying the equivalent of "she had her chance to do this, got all the required notifications and warning and ignored them all. Therefore, we are simply assuming that..." and then it rolls on, usually to the non-responder’s disadvantage.
Military life, living on base, nine-year marriage, no kids... What is there to contest? The division of assets is probably about as cut and clear as can be. No kids, assuming no house (seeing as you live on base), possibly the average amount in debts and commitments (credit-card, car-lease and such). Like-it-or-not she is probably entitled to part of your pension for the last 9 years... She’s probably entitled to some spousal support for some years... These are things you can huff and puff about, but chances are she will get both.
Basically, it’s a process dictated by laws and regulations and past examples. There are things you will get, things she can get and things both of you will be unhappy about. I’m guesstimating that if you two were in agreement you could finish the financial aspect of this divorce in a couple of days.
I suggest in the strongest way that you get legal help and guidance. Don’t know if you use a civil attorney or if the military can provide these services. I am 100% certain that no matter what base you are in that the housing officer and/or the legal team have gone through this, and can let you know right away how best to proceed regarding some practical issues like housing. No – you cant kick her out and she does have some rights, but possibly those rights diminish at some certain point after certain documents are signed. Possibly you don’t want (or warrant) a house as a single person. Possibly there are officer-quarters that you can reside in while this is dealt with. Or maybe not... this is where gathering info/intel comes in...
None of these deals with the emotional impact of divorce. I really understand that. Just like the officers responsibility of evaluating, planning and implementing doesn’t remove his fear or concerns about his decisions. But by looking at your impeding divorce as a task – a project – you can get this ball rolling, and that will quicken the inevitable end.
Remove the fears and replace them with reality. That might change the fears into concerns, but then you deal with them as they come along.