Late to the party, thought I would add my 2 cents on the latest comments.
I think anyone will agree that infidelity destroys something that can’t ever be fully restored. However, I think what matters here is what you do with that reality and whether every outcome besides divorce can be labeled "injustice."
To me, the "justice = divorce" equation oversimplifies something that’s deeply personal and situational. Not everyone gets a "net gain" just because their spouse stayed. If anything, a remorseful WS often lives with the long-term consequences every single day—loss of trust, loss of respect, restricted access, ongoing accountability, transparency, therapy, and the reality that the relationship will never be what it once was. It’s a permanent downgrade of their own self-worth. This doesn’t sound like much of a reward to me.
The BS staying isn’t some cushy "comfort and security" situation. Staying after infidelity is often the harder path. It means years of trauma processing, vulnerability, boundary-setting, and relearning how to emotionally coexist with someone who hurt you.
DR.SOOLERS, your "bad choices deserve bad outcomes" line reads more like a punishment philosophy than a justice philosophy. Justice isn’t always about inflicting maximum pain; sometimes it’s about creating a life you actually want to live. For some, that’s leaving. For others, that’s rebuilding something on their own terms.
And the idea of "cutting off your nose to spite your face"… divorce isn’t inherently justice. For some it is. For others, it’s just another painful outcome. Choosing not to amputate your entire life because your partner blew up the M isn’t weakness or lack of self-respect. It’s making a decision based on what serves your future, not your anger.
Divorce is a consequence. Rebuilding with strict boundaries, conditions, and accountability is also a consequence. Neither cancels out the damage or restores the original "house." They’re just different paths forward.