I tend to be rather direct and speak my mind, so I find it strange to have some trepidation about what I’m going to post now. That trepidation is because I don’t want to be misunderstood.
Sexual addiction is a debated subject. Recognized psychological organizations still dispute if it’s an addiction (as in alcohol, drug, food etc) or a behavioral issue. Mental or physiological or what.
This isn’t unique – the most "acknowledged" and recognized addiction – alcoholism – had the same issues back in the early 1970-1980 period. Was it a moral weakness, behavior, or more? People are still discovering the "more", but drug- and alcohol addiction is now recognized as a disease – not a purely mental issue.
At the time alcoholism became commonly acknowledged as an illness there were a lot of people who had screwed up their lives that shared that they were alcoholics, that the disease made them screw up their career, family, relationships etc, and went for treatment. A month in detox and three months of AA, and they expected their family to return, job to be there, finances in order. After all – it wasn’t their fault: it was the disease and they were "cured".
This is also the time where success rates for AA plummeted. So many that went to AA for half a year fell off the wagon. Two reasons for that IMHO: for one, they didn’t realize that if you are an addict you are an addict for life. You don’t "heal", but you learn to live where you don’t feed your addiction. You need constant "medication" / AA -meetings to remain healthy.
The other reason being that for many it’s a behavior and not an addiction. Wrong drinking patterns more than a physical and psychological craving. Using a treatment focused on cravings rather than behaviors won’t work.
I personally think sexual addiction is an issue. It’s real. It’s an addiction. It’s real.
But I also think that it’s an ADICTION and therefore "uncurable". It’s treatable – but if your husband is a sexual addict he will need constant therapy and meetings for life. He won’t be "over it" in half a year.
The frequency of meetings might drop. Like an alcoholic sober for 20 years might only attend a bi-monthly meeting. But once he considers himself "healed" he runs the risk of falling off the wagon.
This is why I would be very happy for you if this was a behavioral issue rather than an addiction. But if it is an addiction – then I hope you both treat it as an addiction and realize it’s life-long.
PLEASE don’t read the above as me doubting he is an SA. It’s more that I’m asking the two of you to be 100% clear if he is or not, because the treatment (SA, 12step etc) is aimed at addicts – and his comment about being fully recovered in some months makes me question if he understands what he’s dealing with.
-
I want to point out one thing that IMHO is very relevant if you two want to work on your marriage:
There are all sorts of theories on how a married couple should handle money.
Just keep in mind that financial issues is a bigger cause of divorce than infidelity.
One reason he can purchase sex-workers is the lack of transparency in finances. If you two have separate accounts (fine) but neither have access to each others accounts (not fine) then IMHO that is not a healthy financial marriage. Doesn’t have to be more than a viewing access.
Chances are that as far as taxes, debt and death goes (yay! The fun stuff...) a married couple is one legal financial entity. Like if your husband owed a bunch of money, the bailiffs wouldn’t only take half the living-room furniture or leave behind 3 out of 6 table-settings. There is a legal expectation of joint accountability. Same if one of you passes away – it’s a joint estate that has to be managed. Chances are he would have some rights to your pension, and vice-versa.
Why would either of you trust the other for creating and raising a child, but not on finances?
This separate-but-third account for joint costs...
What happens if your income drops? Let’s say you get laid off, or get ill? Imagine you could still make your half of the "joint" costs, but have nothing left. Does that mean he can go get a new golf-club and maybe even renew his car, while you need to take the bus because you can’t afford gas on your vehicle?
What if he wants to go to Spain for the summer, but you can’t afford it?
What if you want steak, but he can only afford liver?
What if you can’t make your part of the mortgage? Does he calculate interest if he "loans" you the missing part?
What about your later years? Going to spend your last decade cooped up at home because you can’t afford to travel or have adventures, only for him to pass away and then realize that as his wife and therefore (probably) his heir that he had thousands and thousands saved away in "his" account?
I strongly encourage you two to reconsider your finances as part of the process of reestablishing your ongoing marriage. Combined finances (even if separate per se)
I’m fine with separate accounts – not the issue. But AT LEAST make it so you are both accountable to each other. He can view your account and question transactions, just like you can his.
Remember though that with this transparency there is both accountability and a level of permissiveness. The issue isn’t that you monitor his account and throw a tantrum if he spends money on a power-tool. If your debts are up-to-date, your future expenditures funded and there is leeway in the money then you can both spend "sensibly" on things that are for you.
It’s more that you are allowed to question cash-withdrawals if you suspect him of seeking sex-workers, online charges to sexynudemommadotcom, charges to loveshack hotel and so on. Just like he might question your seventh purchase of a purse this month, seeing as how you both know money will be tight next month...
--
I can share that my wife and I combined our finances despite having separate accounts. I have full access to her accounts, as she mine. Some bills are charged to me (the mortgage, utilities etc) and at the end of each month either she or I check how much she needs to transfer to my account to cover our bills and credit-cards and such. We can see all transactions on accounts, cards and the like.
Maybe once every 2-3 months either she or I will ask the other about a transaction. Never been an issue – because of the clarity we have in finances we don’t experience events like me buying an expensive fishing-rod unless both are in the know, and the budget allows for it. Just like I wouldn’t get away with paying for sex-work.
Did this some decades ago when we were recovering from a very rough spot. I think that nothing we have done has helped as much in communications and the building of trust as the decision for total financial transparency to each other.
Now... where are those damned cookies?